• 作者： 馬信行
• 作者服務機構： Department of Education National Cheng-Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan
• 中文摘要： This study tries to rank taiwanese Journals in the field of education in the order of quality. 94 Journals were selected, Their "number of referee, " "frequency of mutual citation of the latest 5 volumes," "percentage of empirical article," and "peer evaluation," were used as variables and were summed up to be the quality scores. According to the quality scores, the Journals were clustered into 5 groups. The contributions of this study are (a)theoretically it formulates hypotheses, that the more frequently a Journal is cited, the more referees a Journal has, and/or the more empirically oriented a Journal is, the higher the probability would be that the Journal possesses high quality. And the higher the quality of a Journal is, the higher the probability would be that the Journal contains more truth related knowledge, (b)practically The rank order of Journals can be used for the evaluation of quality of published articles.
• 英文摘要： 本研究嘗試將台灣教育相關期刊依其品質予以排序，為確定何者為教育相關期刊，將民 74-85學年度獲國科會獎助之教育學門，就其參考書目所列之期刊加以計次，從中選出94種。將此94種期刊之送外審人數、近五期互相引用次數、近五期論文實證導向、總分、專家 評分等變項加總成為品質總分，以群集分析分為五組，並將各變項分別排序，以顯出各期刊之特色。本研究對理論上的貢獻為提出下列假設：含實證性論文百分率愈多的、送外審人數 愈多的、被引用愈多的期刊，其為高品質期刊之機率也愈高。而品質愈高的期刊所含接近真理的知識之機率也愈高。在實用上本文結果可供對已發表論文之計點參考。
• 中文關鍵字： Rank of Educational journals, Journal quality, citation.
• 英文關鍵字： 教育期刊排名，期刊品質，引用