• 作者： 郭賽華
• 作者服務機構： 國立清華大學外國語文學系
• 中文摘要： 本文採用台灣立法院質詢談話錄音為語料，以言談分析的研究方法來探討現代中國人政治對話衝突裡的爭辯策略。我們的分析發現，反對黨立法委員在質詢中所提出大部份問題的語言形式和意圖均在責備或批評被質詢的政府官員；後者亦明白這些問題將一步步導向責難而作出防衛性的反應。有些官員甚至不對各種挑釁或指控予以解釋或否認，而直接用與先前對方形式完全相同的語言加以反擊。此外，這一類對話衝突裡的敵意也經常藉由冷嘲熱諷的方式表達出來。另一方面，受窘的官員也可能強調雙方的共同點，例如同姓同宗或同為國家利益著想以安撫對方，而脫離困境。最後，我們認為，立法院質詢中的言語衝突並非完全負面的；它也可能為中國的政治體系帶來活力與進步。
• 英文摘要： Taking tape-recorded data from parliamentary interpellations in Taiwan, I examined theargumentative strategies used in legislative question and answer sessions. I found that mostquestions from opposition legislators were designed to blame or criticize government officals,whose anticipation prompted them to become defensive. However, several combative officialsdid not respond to challenges or accusations with justificatins or denials but with counter-actionsidentical to the accusing questions in surface structure. Hostility in this type of adversarialdialogue was frequently conveyed by sarcasm. On the other hand, embarrassed officials oc-casionally offered conciliatory responses, including the invoking of shared wants and socialmemberships, to get out of specific predicament. Finally, I argue that verbal conflict in par-liamentary interpellations has brought vitality and progress to the Chinese political system.
• 中文關鍵字： political discourse; conflict talk; parliamentary interpellation; argumentative strategy
• 英文關鍵字： --