- 作者: 朱雲漢
- 作者服務機構: 國立台灣大學政治系
- 中文摘要: 國家機構在東亞新興工業化國家經濟發展過程中扮演的角色,一直是晚近比較政治經濟學中理論爭論的焦點,新古典學派與發展性國家論者之間爭議的焦點,並非在于東亞新興工業化國家的政府是否在總體面扮演了積極促進發展的功能,而是在個別產業發展的過程中政府的干預角色。本文以台灣與南韓的汽車工業在七十與八十年代的發展為例,探究為何在非常近似的工業基礎條件、受制同樣的國內市場規模及多國際企業的國際分工策略條件下,兩國的汽車工業發展的差距日益擴大。本文認為主要的原因在于兩國政府的汽車工業發展政策,並進一步提供經驗性論證,說明政策如何引導兩國汽車製造商的投資策略,並進而影響產業結構的變化,同時並追溯政策形成的原因,認為兩國在經濟官僚體系的結構特質,與政商關係的安排上均有顯著的不同。
- 英文摘要: No industry better reflects the separation between South Korea's and Taiwan's industrialupgrading experiences than the automotive industry. The automotive industries in these twoEast Asian NICs have traveled distinctly diverse routes to industrial upgrading largely as a resultof differences in state policy. For this paper I concentrated on domestic institutional sourcesto uncover the different patterns of state actions and varying degrees of their effectiveness asthey affected private sector business strategies. Certainly, the adjustment experiences of eachNIC's automotive industry can be generalized to include those of the most advanced sectorsthat received enthusiastic governmental promotion during the 1970s and 1980s. The automotiveindustry also is a good case for understanding the sources of various state adjustment strategiesbecause, in the long run, it contributes to our understanding of industrial changes and North-South structural conflict on a global level.
- 中文關鍵字: South Korea; Taiwan; automotive; industry; industrial policy; newly industrialized countries; developmental state
- 英文關鍵字: --