• 作者： 華昌宜、許秉翔、黃慧琦、鄭文良
• 作者服務機構： 國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所
• 中文摘要： For ranking regional studies journal in Taiwan, we establish four kinds of criteria for evaluation. These criterias include: journal and article formations, prize-winning and sponsorship records in National Science Council, editorial review process, and extra bonus. In addition, we give weights to calculate final result of journal ranking. In order to test the validity of our evaluation method, we invited 18 scholars in these fields to perform subjective evaluation. The two evaluations have similar results. The Pearson relative coefficient is 0.784. At the same time, scholars' subjective evaluation reveals that there is a consensus in the same displine, but their conflicts are mainly from different evaluations for diverse displines.
• 英文摘要： 本文以期刊論文格式、論文國科會得獎記錄、審稿制度、加扣分項目四類準則構成區域研究學門期刊排序的評估架構。最後再由作者直接賦予權重，計算出期刊評估的結果。為了檢驗本研究所提出的評估架構之有效性，我們商請十八位區域研究學門的學者作主觀的評分。對照的結果顯示兩者相當一致，皮爾森（Pearson ）相關係數為0.775 。同時學者主觀評分的結果也顯示，各學科對期刊的評比意見一致，差異主要來自不同學科之間對彼此的評價不同。
• 中文關鍵字： regional studies, journal quality, journal ranking
• 英文關鍵字： 區域研究學門，期刊品質，期刊排序